tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3874491376486678989.post1215669473815518263..comments2023-01-27T00:22:30.263-08:00Comments on Michael Burford's Lame Blog: ThroughererMichaelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15670593399839068429noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3874491376486678989.post-54737955157260955342012-08-16T10:11:16.525-07:002012-08-16T10:11:16.525-07:00Please, everyone, it's a microliter: µL.Please, everyone, it's a microliter: µL. Jebhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12958605197266890382noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3874491376486678989.post-13445041119227982662012-08-16T07:20:15.284-07:002012-08-16T07:20:15.284-07:00Nice analysis.
FWIW, kg/L seems like a nice measu...Nice analysis.<br /><br />FWIW, kg/L seems like a nice measurement of density (1 kg/L is the density of water) and would give numbers 1000 times the values you state, which would be between 0 and 5, and probably easier to read.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05181166420118175126noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3874491376486678989.post-31547452463415182632012-08-15T21:45:36.010-07:002012-08-15T21:45:36.010-07:00I'd guess the newer iPad will use newer glass ...I'd guess the newer iPad will use newer glass that's even thinner for the same strength. http://www.corninggorillaglass.com/news/press-releases/corning-unveils-new-gorilla%C2%AE-glass-2<br /><br />And yeah, g/mm³ is right. I just couldn't find the ³ key on my keyboard. Maybe I should have stuck to pounds per cubic inch :)Michaelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15670593399839068429noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3874491376486678989.post-36472782508288139192012-08-15T18:09:31.248-07:002012-08-15T18:09:31.248-07:00Do the larger screens require thicker glass to mai...Do the larger screens require thicker glass to maintain strength over a larger area? Same goes for the back panel. I would guess that the density falls between an iPhone and an iPad.a random Johnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00171440665580964896noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3874491376486678989.post-24929585398917242672012-08-15T16:55:15.577-07:002012-08-15T16:55:15.577-07:00Michael, please! “gm/mm3”? “cubic mm”? Those aren’...Michael, please! “gm/mm3”? “cubic mm”? Those aren’t the correct symbols and this isn’t an IBM Selectric, which at any rate could type superscripts.<br /><br />g/mm³ and mm³, please.joeclarkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09643435523090636953noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3874491376486678989.post-62933029601831035342012-08-15T15:59:21.578-07:002012-08-15T15:59:21.578-07:00I was thinking the same thing... Gruber was on the...I was thinking the same thing... Gruber was on the ball, but comparing apples to oranges (could I change that to lemons????) instead of apples to apples. Joehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08822861815087491539noreply@blogger.com